Metric Spaces MT23, Completeness


Flashcards

Can you give an example of a metric space and a sequence such that the sequence is Cauchy but not convergent?

\[X = (0, 1], x _ n = \frac 1 n\]

What implication links convergent sequences and Cauchy sequences in metric spaces?

\[\text{convergent} \implies \text{Cauchy}\]

What implication links Cauchy sequences and bounded sequences in metric spaces?

\[\text{Cauchy} \implies \text{bounded}\]

What does it mean for a metric space to be complete?

Every Cauchy sequence converges.

Can you give an example to show that completeness is not preserved under homeomorphisms?

\(\mathbb R \text{ and } (-1, 1)\) using e.g. \(x \mapsto \frac{x}{\sqrt{1+x^2}\\,}\)

What “if and only if” do we have for when a subspace of a complete metric space is also complete?

A subspace of a complete metric space is complete if and only if it is closed.

Can you state Cantor’s intersection theorem?

Let $X$ be a complete metric space where $S _ i$ are non-empty closed sets in $X$ \(S _ 1 \supseteq S _ 2 \supseteq \cdots\) where $\text{diam}(S _ n) \to 0$, as $n \to \infty$, then \(\bigcap^\infty _ {n=1} S _ n = \\{a\\}\)

If $X$ is a complete metric space, what conditions do you need on sets $S _ i$ for Cantor’s intersection theorem so that $\bigcap^\infty _ {n=1} S _ n = \{a\}$?

$S _ i$ are non-empty closed sets, $S _ 1 \supseteq S _ 2 \supseteq \cdots$ and $\text{diam}(S _ n) \to 0$.

Quickly prove Cantor’s intersection theorem, i.e. that if

  • $X$ is a complete metric space
  • $S _ i$ are non-empty closed sets
  • $S _ 1 \supseteq S _ 2 \supseteq \cdots$
  • $\text{diam}(S _ n) \to 0$

Then \(\bigcap^\infty _ {i = 1} S _ i = \\{a\\}\) for some $a \in X$.

For each $n$, pick some $x _ n \in S _ n$. Then $(x _ n)^\infty _ {n = 1}$ is Cauchy, since given any $\varepsilon > 0$, there is some $N$ large enough that $\forall n > N$, $\text{diam}(S _ n) < \varepsilon$. If $n, m \ge N$, then since the $S _ i$s are nested, $d(x _ n, x _ m) \le \text{diam}(S _ N) < \varepsilon$.

Since $X$ complete, $x _ n \to a$ for some $a \in X$.

For each $i$, the nesting property implies that $x _ n \in S _ i$ for all $i \le n$.

Since each $S _ i$ is closed, $a \in S _ i$. Since this is true for all $i$, \(a \in \bigcap^\infty _ {i = 1} S _ i\) For uniqueness, suppose that \(b \in \bigcap^\infty _ {i = 1} S _ i\) Then $d(a, b) \le \text{diam}(S _ i)$ for all $i$.

Since $\text{diam}(S _ i) \to 0$, $d(a, b) = 0$, so $a = b$.

What can you say about the completeness of $B(X)$?

It is complete.

What can you say about the completeness of $C _ b(X)$?

It is complete.

When $X = \mathbb R$, how can you restate the fact that $C _ b(X)$ is complete more familiarly?

The uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous.

What’s the basic idea behind proving the completness of $B(X)$ or $C(X)$ with the $\sup$ norm, given a Cauchy sequence of functions $(f _ n)$?

We know that the pointwise limit exists, since for fixed $x$, $f _ n(x)$ is a real number so each Cauchy sequence there will converge. Then show that this pointwise limit satisfies the required properties to be in $B(X)$ or $C(X)$.

The Cantor set is defined by \(C = [0, 1] \setminus \bigcup _ {m=1}^\infty \bigcup _ {k=0}^{3^{m-1} - 1} \left( \frac{3k+1}{3^m}, \frac{3k + 2}{3^m} \right)\) Proving that it’s complete looks like a nightmare. What chain of deductions might you use in situations like this to actually prove this quite easily?

  • $C$ is bounded
  • $C$ is closed, since $A \setminus B = A \cap B^{C}$ and so we have an intersection of closed subsets
  • By the Heine-Borel theorem, $C$ is compact
  • Compactness implies completeness.

What more general theorem allows you to deduce that any closed subset of $\mathbb R$ is complete?

Any closed subset of a complete metric space is complete.

Quickly prove that $B(X)$ is a complete metric space with respect to $\infty$-norm.

Let $(f _ n)^\infty _ {n = 1}$ be a Cauchy sequence in $B(X)$. Then for each $x$, the sequence $(f _ n(x))^\infty _ {n = 1}$ is a Cauchy sequence of real numbers, since $\forall \varepsilon > 0$, $\exists N$ s.t. $\forall n, m \ge N$, $ \vert f _ n(x) - f _ m(x) \vert \le \vert \vert f _ n - f _ m \vert \vert _ \infty < \varepsilon$.

Let $f$ be the pointwise limit, ie.. \(f(x) = \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x)\) We claim $f$ is a bounded function. Take $\varepsilon = 1$ in the definition of a Cauchy sequence, then $\exists N$ s.t. $\forall n, m \ge N$, \(\sup_x \vert f_n(x) - f_m(x) \vert \ge 1\) Then \(\vert f_N(x) - f_n(x) \vert \le 1 \quad \forall n \ge N, \forall x \in X\) Taking the limit as $n \to \infty$, \(\vert f_N(x) - f(x) \vert \le 1\) Since $f_N$ is a bounded function, so is $f$.

Finally, we need to show that $f_n \to f$ in the norm $ \vert \vert \cdot \vert \vert _\infty$. Let $\varepsilon > 0$ and let $N$ be such that if $n, m \ge N$, $ \vert f _ n(x) - f _ m(x) \vert \le \varepsilon$ for all $x \in X$.

Then, for each fixed $n \ge N$ and $x \in X$, we can let $m \to \infty$, obtaining $ \vert f _ n(x) - f(x) \vert \le \varepsilon$. Then $\forall n \ge N$, $ \vert \vert f _ n - f \vert \vert _ \infty \le \varepsilon$. It follows $f _ n \to f$ in the $ \vert \vert \cdot \vert \vert _ \infty$ norm.

By assuming that $B(X)$ is a complete metric space, can you prove that $C _ B(X)$ is a complete metric space with respect to the $\infty$-norm?

Since we are assuming that $B(X)$ is complete, it suffices to show that $C _ B(X)$ is a closed subset of $B(X)$ (because subsets of complete metric spaces are complete iff they are closed).

Suppose $(f _ n)^\infty _ {n = 1}$ is a sequence of elements of $C _ B(X)$ convering in the $\infty$-norm to some $f \in B(X)$. Fix some $a \in X$ for which we want to show continuity at and let $\varepsilon > 0$. Since $f _ n \to f$ in the $\infty$-norm, there $\exists n$ s.t. \(\vert \vert f _ n - f \vert \vert _ \infty \le \varepsilon / 3\) Since $f _ n$ is continuous, there exists $\delta > 0$ s.t. \(\vert f _ n(x) - f _ n(a) \vert < \varepsilon/3\) for all $x \in B(a, \delta)$, so we have \(\begin{aligned} \vert f(x) - f(a) \vert &\le \vert f(x) - f _ n(x) \vert + \vert f _ n(x) - f _ n(a) \vert + \vert f _ n(a) - f(a) \vert \\\\ &< \varepsilon/3 + \varepsilon/3 + \varepsilon/3 \\\\ &= \varepsilon \end{aligned}\) so the limit is also continuous, hence $C _ B(X)$ is a closed subset of $C(X)$, so it is complete.

Proofs

Quickly prove that if a subspace of a complete metric space is complete if and only if is closed.

Proof sketch:

  • If a subset $Y$ is closed in $X$, a Cauchy sequence in $Y$ is also a Cauchy sequence in $X$. Since $Y$ is closed, the limit must be in $Y$.
  • If a subset $Y$ is complete, then any convergent subsequence is also convergent to an element of $Y$, so it is closed.



Related posts