Galois Theory HT25, Galois groups and Galois extensions



Flashcards

Definition of a Galois group

Suppose:

  • $F \subset \mathbb C$
  • $K/F$ is a Galois extension

@Define the Galois group of $K/F$, written $\text{Gal}(K/F)$.


The group of all $F$-linear field automorphisms of $K$.

@Define an $F$-linear field automorphism of $K$ where $K/F$.


A bijective map $\theta : K \to K$ such that for all $k _ 1, k _ 2 \in K$, and $f \in F$:

\[\begin{aligned} \theta(k_1 k_2) &= \theta(k_1) \theta(k_2) \\\\ \theta(k_1 + k_2) &= \theta(k_1) + \theta(k_2) \\\\ \theta(f k_1) &= f \theta(k_1) \end{aligned}\]

Suppose:

  • $K/F$ is an extension
  • $H$ is a subgroup of $\text{Gal}(K/F)$

@Define the fixed field of $H$, written $K^H$.


\[K^H = \\{x \in K \mid \forall \sigma \in H,\text{ }\sigma(x) = x \\}\]

Splitting fields

Suppose:

  • $F \subset \mathbb C$ is a subfield
  • $f \in F[x]$ is a non-constant polynomial

@Define a splitting field of $f$ over $F$.


$K \supseteq F$ is said to be a splitting field of $f$ if:

  • $f$ splits completely in $K[t]$, and
  • $K$ is generated as a field by $F$ together with the roots of $f$.

Suppose:

  • $K/F$ is a field extension
  • $\alpha _ 1, \ldots, \alpha _ n \in K$ are algebraic over $F$

Then:

\[[F(\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n) : F] < \infty\]

@State a useful corollary of this fact related to splitting fields.


If $f \in F[t]$ and $K$ is a splitting field of $f$, then $[K : F] < \infty$.

Suppose:

  • $f \in F[t]$ is irreducible

@Prove that you can always find a (simple!) extension field $K \supset F$ which includes a root of $f$ (note that $F$ can’t contain any roots of $f$, or it wouldn’t be irreducible).


Since $f$ is irreducible in $F[t]$, $\langle f \rangle$ must be a maximal ideal in $F[t]$ and hence $K := \frac{F[t]}{\langle f\rangle}$ is a field. Then $\alpha := t + \langle f \rangle$ is a root of $f$ in $K$.

Since $\alpha$ generates $K$ as a ring together with $F$, $K = F[\alpha]$.

Since $\alpha$ is algebraic over $F$, it follows

\[F(\alpha) = F[\alpha] = K\]

and $K / F$ is the required extension.

Suppose:

  • $f \in F[t]$ be any polynomial

@Prove that there exists a splitting field $K$ of $f$.


Induct on $d := \deg f$.

Base case. $d = 1$. Then $F$ is already a splitting field.

Inductive step. $d > 1$. Suppose that $g$ is an irreducible factor of $f$. By the result that says:

If $g \in F[t]$ is irreducible, there exists a simple extension $F(\alpha)$ where $\alpha$ is a root of $g$.

we can construct $L := F(\alpha)$. Since $g \mid f$, $f(\alpha) = 0$ and hence $(t - \alpha) \mid f$.

Define $h := \frac{g}{(t - \alpha)} \in L[t]$. Since $\deg h < d$, by induction there exists a splitting field $K$ of $h$.

Since $a \in L \subset K$, $f = (t - \alpha) \cdot h$ splits completely in $K[t]$.

Since the roots of $f$ in $K$ generate $K$ together with $F$, it follows that $K$ is a splitting field of $f$.

Suppose:

  • $f \in F[t]$ is a separable polynomial

Is it true that any two splitting fields of $f$ are isomorphic?


Yes.

We have a result that says if:

  • $\varphi : F \to \tilde F$ is an isomorphism of fields
  • $f \in F[t]$ is a separable polynomial
  • $K$ is a splitting field for $f$
  • $\tilde f = \varphi(f)$
  • $\tilde K$ is a splitting field for $\tilde f$

then there are at least $[K : F]$ distinct isomorphisms extending $\varphi$. Use this to @prove that if $f \in F[t]$ is a separble polynomial, then any two splitting fields of $f$ are isomorphic.


We show this in three steps:

  1. Show that if $L$ is another extension of $F$ such that $f$ splits completely, there exists at least one injective homomorphism $K \to L$.
  2. Show that if $L$ is a splitting field of $f$, then this injective homomorphism is actually an isomorphism.
  3. Conclude that any two splitting fields of $f$ are isomorphic.

(1): Let $\tilde K$ be the subfield of $L$ generated by $F$ together with the roots of $f$. Then by the result above, there exists at least one isomorphism $\varphi : K \to \tilde K$ extending the identity map on $F$. If $i : \tilde K \to L$ is the inclusion map, then $i \circ \varphi : K \to L$ is the required monomorphism.

(2): If $L$ is a splitting field of $F$, it follows that $\tilde K$ as defined above equals $L$, and hence this injective homomorphism must actually be an isomorphism.

(3): Since there are isomorphism between these two splitting fields, and these splitting fields are isomorphic, it folows that any two splitting fields of $f$ are isomorphic.

Suppose:

  • $K = \mathbb F _ {125}(t)$
  • $f(x) = x^{124} - t \in K[x]$
  • $E$ is a splitting field for $f$ over $K$

Can you show that

\[E \cong \frac{K[x]}{\langle f\rangle}\]

?


Since any two splitting fields of a polynomial are isomorphic, this follows from showing that $\frac{K[x]}{\langle f \rangle}$ is a splitting field for $f$. Clearly $\frac{K[x]}{\langle f \rangle}$ contains a root $\alpha := \langle f \rangle$ of $f$, and note that if $u \in \mathbb F _ {125}^\times$, then $u\alpha$ is also a root. Hence $\frac{K[x]}{\langle f \rangle}$ contains all the roots and is generated by them, so it is a splitting field.

@example~ @exam~

Galois extensions

Suppose:

  • $F \subset \mathbb C$ is a subfield
  • $K / F$ is a finite field extension

@Define what it means for $K/F$ to be a Galois extension.


There is a separable polynomial $f \in F[x]$ such that $K/F$ is the splitting field of $f$.

A useful separable polynomial

Suppose:

  • $H$ is a finite group of automorphisms of a field $L$
  • $X \subseteq L$, $X$ is finite

@Define a polynomial $f _ X$ which satisfies the properties:

  1. $f _ X$ is separable.
  2. If $X$ is $H$-stable, then $f _ X$ has coefficients in $L^H$.

\[f_X := \prod_{y \in X} (t - y) \in L[t]\]

Useful for:

  • Property 1 is used in showing that $t^{p^n} - t$ is separable, and hence that $F$ is a splitting field of $t^{p^n} - t$ iff it has order $p^n$.
  • Both properties are used in showing that the minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ over $K/F$ is the product of $(x - g(\alpha))$ for each $g \in \text{Gal}(K/F)$.
  • Both properties are used in showing that $F = K^G$ implies $K/F$ is Galois.
  • Both properties are used in showing that the $n$-th cyclotomic polynomial lives in $\mathbb Q[t]$.

Suppose:

  • $H$ is a finite group of automorphisms of a field $L$
  • $X \subseteq L$, $X$ is finite
  • $f _ X(t) := \prod _ {y \in X} (t - y) \in L[t]$

@Prove that then:

  1. $f _ X$ is separable.
  2. If $X$ is $H$-stable, then $f _ X$ has coefficients in $L^H$.

Separable: Any factor (and hence any irreducible factor) of $f _ X$ must have the form $f _ Y$ for $Y \subseteq X$, and so it suffices to just check that $D(f _ X) \ne 0$. Note that

\[D(f_X) = \sum_{y \in X} \prod_{z \in X \setminus \\{y\\} }(t - z)\]

Choose any value $u \in X$. If $y \ne u$, then $\prod _ {z \in X \setminus \{y\} } (u - z) = 0$ since the product includes the factor $u - z$ with $z = u$. Therefore

\[D(f_X)(u) = \prod_{z \in X \setminus \\{u\\} } (u - z) \ne 0\]

which is non-zero, and so $f _ X$ is separable.


If $X$ is $H$-stable, then $f _ X$ has coefficients in $L^H$: $H$ acts on $L[t]$ by applying each automorphism to the coefficients and fixing $t$.

Under the assumption $X$ is $H$-stable, the set of linear polynomials

\[\\{t - x : x \in X\\}\]

is $H$-stable. Since the $H$-action respects multiplication in $L[t]$, it follows that the product of these linear polynomials is fixed by $H$:

\[f_X \in L[t]^H = L^H[t]\]

and so $f _ X$ has coefficients in $L^H$.

(Alternatively, can consider that the coefficients are given by symmetric functions of the roots).

Alternative characterisations of being Galois

Suppose:

  • $K/F$ is a finite extension
  • $G = \text{Gal}(K/F)$

@State some equivalent conditions to the condition that $K/F$ is Galois.


The following are equivalent:

  • $K/F$ is Galois.
  • $ \vert G \vert = [K : F]$
  • $F = K^G$

Suppose:

  • $K/F$ is a Galois extension
  • $G = \text{Gal}(K/F)$
  • $ \vert G \vert = [K : F]$

@State a result about the relationship between $F$, $K$ and $G$.


\[F = K^G\]

@Prove that if:

  • $K/F$ is a Galois extension
  • $G = \text{Gal}(K/F)$
  • $ \vert G \vert = [K : F]$

Then:

\[F = K^G\]

This is a consequence of three other results:

  • $G = \text{Gal}(K/K^G)$
  • $ \vert G \vert \le [K : K^G]$ (applying the upper bound on the size of Galois groups to $\text{Gal}(K/K^G)$)
  • $[K : K^G] \le [K : F]$ by the tower law, since $K/K^G/F$.

Then:

\[|G| \le [K : K^G] \le [K : F] = |G|\]

and so $[K : K^G] = [K : F]$ and hence $[K^G : F] = 1$, and so $K^G = F$.

Suppose:

  • $K/F$ is a finite field extension
  • $G = \text{Gal}(K/F)$
  • $F = K^G$

@State a result about what you can then conclude about $K/F$.


$K/F$ is Galois.

@Prove that if:

  • $K/F$ is a finite field extension
  • $G = \text{Gal}(K/F)$
  • $F = K^G$

Then:

  • $K/F$ is Galois.

Let $\{z _ 1, \ldots, z _ n\}$ be an $F$-basis for $K$. Since $G$ is finite (by the result that says finite field extensions lead to finite Galois groups), it follows that the set

\[X := \bigcup^n_{i = 1} G\cdot z_i\]

is finite as well as $G$-stable.

Then we can construct the polynomial $f _ X$ where

\[f_X := \prod_{y \in X} (t - y)\]

which is a separable polynomial with coefficients in $K^G$ (this is nontrivial and comes from a previous result). Since $K^G = F$, it follows $f _ X \in F[t]$.

Since $f _ X$ splits completely over $K$ ($G \cdot z _ i \subseteq K$) and since $K$ is generated by the roots of $f _ X$ in $K$, it is the splitting field of $f _ X$ over $F$.

Abelian extensions

@Define what it means for a Galois extension $K/\mathbb Q$ to be abelian.


\[\text{Gal}(K / \mathbb Q)\]

is an abelian group.

Useful identification with a subgroup of $S _ n$

@Prove that if:

  • $f \in F[t]$ has $n$ distinct roots in a splitting field $K$

then:

  • $G = \text{Gal}(K/F)$ is naturally isomorphic to a subgroup of $S _ n$
  • Further, $f$ is irreducible then this subgroup is transitive

Naturally isomorphic to a subgroup of $S _ n$:

We show there is an injection $\rho : G \to S _ n$. Let $V(f)$ be the set of roots of $f$. Then the action of $G$ on $K$ restricts to an action on $V(f)$. Hence let

\[\rho : G \to \text{Sym}(V(f)) \cong S _ n\]

This map is injective, since if $\rho(\sigma) = \text{id}$ for some $\rho \in G$, then $\sigma$ fixes $V(f)$ pointwise. But $V(f)$ generates $K$ as a field together with $F$, so $\sigma$ fixes all elements of $K$ and hence $\sigma = 1$. Therefore

\[G \cong \rho(G) \le S _ n\]

If $f$ irreducible, then this subgroup is transitive:

If $f$ is irreducible, then $f = m _ {F, \alpha}$ where $\alpha \in V(f)$. Then applying the result

If

  • $\varphi : F \to \tilde F$ is an isomorphism between two fields
  • $K / F$ and $\tilde F / \tilde K$ are finite extensions
  • $\alpha \in K$, $\tilde \alpha \in \tilde K$
  • $\varphi(m _ {F, \alpha})(\tilde \alpha) = 0$

Then there is a unique extension of $\varphi$ to

\[\varphi^\ast : F(\alpha) \to \tilde F(\tilde \alpha)\]

such that $\varphi^\ast (\alpha) = \tilde \alpha$.

where $\varphi$ is the identity and $\tilde \alpha$ is any other root. This gives at least one automorphism of $K$ that swaps $\alpha$ and $\tilde \alpha$, so $G$ is transitive.

Relationship between the Galois group of a field extension and the Galois groups of minimal polynomials of elements of that extension

@State two results concerning the minimal polynomial of any element of a Galois extension.


Suppose:

  • $K/F$ is a Galois extension
  • $\alpha \in K$

Then:

  • $m _ {F, \alpha}$ is separable, and
  • There is a surjective group homomorphism $\text{Gal}(K/F) \to \text{Gal} _ F(m _ {F, \alpha})$

(This result is useful mainly because it comes up in the proof that field extensions with solvable Galois groups are radical).

@Prove that if:

  • $K/F$ is a Galois extension
  • $\alpha \in K$

Then:

  • $m _ {F, \alpha}$ is separable, and
  • There is a surjective group homomorphism $\text{Gal}(K/F) \to \text{Gal} _ F(m _ {F, \alpha})$

(You may assume previous results).


  • $m _ {F, \alpha}$ is irreducible over $F$ and has a zero in $K$ (namely $\alpha$)
  • Since $K/F$ is Galois, it is in particular normal.
  • Therefore $m _ {F, \alpha}$ splits completely in $K$, and so $K$ contains a splitting field of $m _ {F, \alpha}$, say $L$.
  • By another result, $m _ {F, \alpha} = m _ {K^G, \alpha} = f _ {G \cdot \alpha} = \prod _ {\beta \in G\cdot\alpha}(t - \beta)$.
  • Since $f _ X$ is always separable, it follows $m _ {F, \alpha}$ is always separable.

  • Therefore $L/F$ is Galois (it is the splitting field of some separable polynomial).
  • $\text{Gal} _ F(m _ {F, \alpha}) = \text{Gal}(L/F)$ and so the restriction map $\text{Gal}(K/F) \to \text{Gal}(L/F)$ is a surjective group homomorphism.

Composite field extensions

Suppose:

  • $K \supseteq L _ 1, L _ 2 \supseteq F$
  • $L _ 1/F$ and $L _ 2/F$ are Galois extensions
  • $L$ is the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $L _ 1$ and $L _ 2$ ($L = L _ 1 L _ 2$, their “compositum”)

@State a result about how the Galois groups of each of these extensions relate to one another.


  • $L/F$ is also Galois
  • There is an injective homomorphism $\phi : \text{Gal}(L/F) \to \text{Gal}(L _ 1/F) \times \text{Gal}(L _ 2 / F)$
  • If $L _ 1 \cap L _ 2 = F$ (“linearly disjoint”), then this homomorphism is an isomorphism

@exam~

Suppose:

  • $K \supseteq L _ 1, L _ 2 \supseteq F$
  • $L _ 1/F$ and $L _ 2/F$ are Galois extensions
  • $L$ is the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $L _ 1$ and $L _ 2$ ($L = L _ 1 L _ 2$, their “compositum”)

@Prove:

  • $L/F$ is also Galois
  • There is an injective homomorphism $\phi : \text{Gal}(L/F) \to \text{Gal}(L _ 1/F) \times \text{Gal}(L _ 2 / F)$
  • If $L _ 1 \cap L _ 2 = F$ (“linearly disjoint”), then this homomorphism is an isomorphism

$L/F$ is Galois:

$L _ 1$ and $L _ 2$ are the splitting fields of separable polynomials $f _ 1, f _ 2 \in F[x]$. Then $F$ is the splitting field of $f _ 1 f _ 2$, which is also separable. Hence $L/F$ is also Galois.


There is an injective homomorphism $\phi : \text{Gal}(L/F) \to \text{Gal}(L _ 1/F) \times \text{Gal}(L _ 2 / F)$:

Let $G := \text{Gal}(L/F)$ and $H := \text{Gal}(L _ 1/F) \times \text{Gal}(L _ 2 / F)$. Let $\phi : G \to H$ be the map which sends $\sigma \to (\sigma \vert _ {L _ 1}, \sigma \vert _ {L _ 2})$. This map is well-defined as $L _ 1 / F$ and $L _ 2/F$ are both Galois extensions contained in $K$.

To see it is injective, suppose $\phi(\sigma) = (\text{id} _ {L _ 1}, \text{id} _ {L _ 2})$. Since $L$ is generated by the union of the generators for $L _ 1$ and $L _ 2$, it must also be the identity on $L$.


If $L _ 1 \cap L _ 2 = F$, then this homomorphism is an isomorphism:

It suffices to show that $ \vert G \vert = \vert H \vert $. Let $\iota$ be the restriction map

\[\iota : \text{Gal}(L / L_2) \to \text{Gal}(L_1 / F)\]

which sends $\sigma$ to $\sigma \vert _ {L _ 1}$. Since $L _ 2$ contains $F$, the image of $\iota$ fixes $F$. Since $L _ 1$ is Galois, $\iota$ is well-defined and it is injective since any element of its kernel must be the identity on both $L _ 1$ and $L _ 2$.

To see $\iota$ is also surjective, we show that

\[[F : L_2] = |S| = |\text{Gal}(L_1 / K)| = [L_1 : K]\]

as then the size of the domain and range are equal. Consider the subgroup $\iota(\text{Gal}(L/L _ 2))$. Then

\[[L_1 : L_1^\iota(\text{Gal}(L/L_2))] = |\text{Gal}(L/L_2)|\]

as the action of $\iota(\text{Gal}(L/L _ 2))$ on $L _ 1$ is faithful. If we can show $L _ 1^{\iota(\text{Gal}(L/L _ 2))} = L _ 1 \cap L _ 2$, then we will be done as $L _ 1 \cap L _ 2 = F$.

Note

\[\\{x \in L : g(x) = x \text{ } \forall g \in \text{Gal}(L/L_2)\\} = L_2\]

by the Galois correspondence on $L/F$. Therefore

\[L_1^{\iota(\text{Gal}(L/L_2))} = \\{x \in L_1 : g(x) = x \text{ } \forall g \in \text{Gal}(F/L_2)\\} = L_1 \cap L_2\]

and hence

\[|H| = |\text{Gal}(L_1 / F)| \times |\text{Gal}(L_2 / F)| = [L_1 : F][L_2 : F] = [L : L_2][L_2 : F] = [L : F] = |G|\]

as required.

@exam~

Examples and counterexamples

Give an @example of a field extension that is not Galois because of normality reasons.


Consider $\mathbb Q[\alpha] / \mathbb Q$ where $\alpha = \sqrt[3]{2}$. Then $m _ \mathbb Q(x) = x^3 - 2$, but $m(x)$ does not split completely, since it has two roots which are not in $\mathbb Q[\alpha]$.

Give an @example of a field extension that is not Galois because of separability reasons.


Consider $F := \mathbb F _ p(t)$ be the field of fractions over the finite field of size $p$, and let $K$ be a field extension of $F$ containing a root $\alpha$ of $f(x) := x^p - t$. But then $K / F$ is not Galois as it is not separable, since $m _ {F, \alpha}$ is not separable.

Give an @example to show that if you have the sequence of extensions $K ‘ / K / F$ where $K/F$ and $K’/K$ are both Galois, it doesn’t need to be the case that $K’ / F$ is Galois.


  • Let $F = \mathbb Q$, $K = \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)$, $K’ = \mathbb Q(2^{1/4})$.
  • Then:
    • $K/F$ is Galois (it’s the splitting field of $x^2 - 2$)
    • $K’/F$ is Galois (it’s the splitting field of $x^2 - \sqrt{2}$)
    • $K’/F$ is not Galois, since $m _ {\mathbb Q, 2^{1/4} } = x^4 - 2$, which does not split over $K’ \subseteq \mathbb R$.

@exam~

Show that every degree 2 extension $L/K$ where $K$ is a field of odd characteristic is a Galois extension.


Pick any $\alpha \in L \setminus K$. Then $m _ {K, \alpha}(x) = x^2 + bx + c$ for some $b, c \in K$ and this polynomial is irreducible. Since $m _ {K, \alpha}’(x) = 2x + b$, it follows that $m _ {K, \alpha}$ is separable.

We aim to show that $L$ is a splitting field for $m _ {K, \alpha}$. By the quadratic formula,

\[\begin{aligned} m_{K, \alpha}(x) &= \left(x - \frac{-b +\sqrt{b^2 - 4c}}{2}\right) \left(x - \frac{-b - \sqrt{b^2 - 4c}}{2}\right) \\\\ &= (x - \alpha)(x - (\alpha - b)) \end{aligned}\]

Since $\alpha, \alpha - b \in L$ and $L = F(\alpha)$, so $L$ is the splitting field.

@exam~ @example~




Related posts