Galois Theory HT25, Galois groups and Galois extensions
-
Flashcards
- Definition of a Galois group
- Splitting fields
- Galois extensions
- A useful separable polynomial
- Alternative characterisations of being Galois
- Abelian extensions
- Useful identification with a subgroup of $S _ n$
- Relationship between the Galois group of a field extension and the Galois groups of minimal polynomials of elements of that extension
- Composite field extensions
- Examples and counterexamples
Flashcards
Definition of a Galois group
Suppose:
- $F \subset \mathbb C$
- $K/F$ is a Galois extension
@Define the Galois group of $K/F$, written $\text{Gal}(K/F)$.
The group of all $F$-linear field automorphisms of $K$.
@Define an $F$-linear field automorphism of $K$ where $K/F$.
A bijective map $\theta : K \to K$ such that for all $k _ 1, k _ 2 \in K$, and $f \in F$:
\[\begin{aligned} \theta(k_1 k_2) &= \theta(k_1) \theta(k_2) \\\\ \theta(k_1 + k_2) &= \theta(k_1) + \theta(k_2) \\\\ \theta(f k_1) &= f \theta(k_1) \end{aligned}\]Suppose:
- $K/F$ is an extension
- $H$ is a subgroup of $\text{Gal}(K/F)$
@Define the fixed field of $H$, written $K^H$.
Splitting fields
Suppose:
- $F \subset \mathbb C$ is a subfield
- $f \in F[x]$ is a non-constant polynomial
@Define a splitting field of $f$ over $F$.
$K \supseteq F$ is said to be a splitting field of $f$ if:
- $f$ splits completely in $K[t]$, and
- $K$ is generated as a field by $F$ together with the roots of $f$.
Suppose:
- $K/F$ is a field extension
- $\alpha _ 1, \ldots, \alpha _ n \in K$ are algebraic over $F$
Then:
\[[F(\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n) : F] < \infty\]
@State a useful corollary of this fact related to splitting fields.
If $f \in F[t]$ and $K$ is a splitting field of $f$, then $[K : F] < \infty$.
Suppose:
- $f \in F[t]$ is irreducible
@Prove that you can always find a (simple!) extension field $K \supset F$ which includes a root of $f$ (note that $F$ can’t contain any roots of $f$, or it wouldn’t be irreducible).
Since $f$ is irreducible in $F[t]$, $\langle f \rangle$ must be a maximal ideal in $F[t]$ and hence $K := \frac{F[t]}{\langle f\rangle}$ is a field. Then $\alpha := t + \langle f \rangle$ is a root of $f$ in $K$.
Since $\alpha$ generates $K$ as a ring together with $F$, $K = F[\alpha]$.
Since $\alpha$ is algebraic over $F$, it follows
\[F(\alpha) = F[\alpha] = K\]and $K / F$ is the required extension.
Suppose:
- $f \in F[t]$ be any polynomial
@Prove that there exists a splitting field $K$ of $f$.
Induct on $d := \deg f$.
Base case. $d = 1$. Then $F$ is already a splitting field.
Inductive step. $d > 1$. Suppose that $g$ is an irreducible factor of $f$. By the result that says:
If $g \in F[t]$ is irreducible, there exists a simple extension $F(\alpha)$ where $\alpha$ is a root of $g$.
we can construct $L := F(\alpha)$. Since $g \mid f$, $f(\alpha) = 0$ and hence $(t - \alpha) \mid f$.
Define $h := \frac{g}{(t - \alpha)} \in L[t]$. Since $\deg h < d$, by induction there exists a splitting field $K$ of $h$.
Since $a \in L \subset K$, $f = (t - \alpha) \cdot h$ splits completely in $K[t]$.
Since the roots of $f$ in $K$ generate $K$ together with $F$, it follows that $K$ is a splitting field of $f$.
Suppose:
- $f \in F[t]$ is a separable polynomial
Is it true that any two splitting fields of $f$ are isomorphic?
Yes.
We have a result that says if:
- $\varphi : F \to \tilde F$ is an isomorphism of fields
- $f \in F[t]$ is a separable polynomial
- $K$ is a splitting field for $f$
- $\tilde f = \varphi(f)$
- $\tilde K$ is a splitting field for $\tilde f$
then there are at least $[K : F]$ distinct isomorphisms extending $\varphi$. Use this to @prove that if $f \in F[t]$ is a separble polynomial, then any two splitting fields of $f$ are isomorphic.
We show this in three steps:
- Show that if $L$ is another extension of $F$ such that $f$ splits completely, there exists at least one injective homomorphism $K \to L$.
- Show that if $L$ is a splitting field of $f$, then this injective homomorphism is actually an isomorphism.
- Conclude that any two splitting fields of $f$ are isomorphic.
(1): Let $\tilde K$ be the subfield of $L$ generated by $F$ together with the roots of $f$. Then by the result above, there exists at least one isomorphism $\varphi : K \to \tilde K$ extending the identity map on $F$. If $i : \tilde K \to L$ is the inclusion map, then $i \circ \varphi : K \to L$ is the required monomorphism.
(2): If $L$ is a splitting field of $F$, it follows that $\tilde K$ as defined above equals $L$, and hence this injective homomorphism must actually be an isomorphism.
(3): Since there are isomorphism between these two splitting fields, and these splitting fields are isomorphic, it folows that any two splitting fields of $f$ are isomorphic.
Suppose:
- $K = \mathbb F _ {125}(t)$
- $f(x) = x^{124} - t \in K[x]$
- $E$ is a splitting field for $f$ over $K$
Can you show that
\[E \cong \frac{K[x]}{\langle f\rangle}\]
?
Since any two splitting fields of a polynomial are isomorphic, this follows from showing that $\frac{K[x]}{\langle f \rangle}$ is a splitting field for $f$. Clearly $\frac{K[x]}{\langle f \rangle}$ contains a root $\alpha := \langle f \rangle$ of $f$, and note that if $u \in \mathbb F _ {125}^\times$, then $u\alpha$ is also a root. Hence $\frac{K[x]}{\langle f \rangle}$ contains all the roots and is generated by them, so it is a splitting field.
@example~ @exam~
Galois extensions
Suppose:
- $F \subset \mathbb C$ is a subfield
- $K / F$ is a finite field extension
@Define what it means for $K/F$ to be a Galois extension.
There is a separable polynomial $f \in F[x]$ such that $K/F$ is the splitting field of $f$.
A useful separable polynomial
Suppose:
- $H$ is a finite group of automorphisms of a field $L$
- $X \subseteq L$, $X$ is finite
@Define a polynomial $f _ X$ which satisfies the properties:
- $f _ X$ is separable.
- If $X$ is $H$-stable, then $f _ X$ has coefficients in $L^H$.
Useful for:
- Property 1 is used in showing that $t^{p^n} - t$ is separable, and hence that $F$ is a splitting field of $t^{p^n} - t$ iff it has order $p^n$.
- Both properties are used in showing that the minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ over $K/F$ is the product of $(x - g(\alpha))$ for each $g \in \text{Gal}(K/F)$.
- Both properties are used in showing that $F = K^G$ implies $K/F$ is Galois.
- Both properties are used in showing that the $n$-th cyclotomic polynomial lives in $\mathbb Q[t]$.
Suppose:
- $H$ is a finite group of automorphisms of a field $L$
- $X \subseteq L$, $X$ is finite
- $f _ X(t) := \prod _ {y \in X} (t - y) \in L[t]$
@Prove that then:
- $f _ X$ is separable.
- If $X$ is $H$-stable, then $f _ X$ has coefficients in $L^H$.
Separable: Any factor (and hence any irreducible factor) of $f _ X$ must have the form $f _ Y$ for $Y \subseteq X$, and so it suffices to just check that $D(f _ X) \ne 0$. Note that
\[D(f_X) = \sum_{y \in X} \prod_{z \in X \setminus \\{y\\} }(t - z)\]Choose any value $u \in X$. If $y \ne u$, then $\prod _ {z \in X \setminus \{y\} } (u - z) = 0$ since the product includes the factor $u - z$ with $z = u$. Therefore
\[D(f_X)(u) = \prod_{z \in X \setminus \\{u\\} } (u - z) \ne 0\]which is non-zero, and so $f _ X$ is separable.
If $X$ is $H$-stable, then $f _ X$ has coefficients in $L^H$: $H$ acts on $L[t]$ by applying each automorphism to the coefficients and fixing $t$.
Under the assumption $X$ is $H$-stable, the set of linear polynomials
\[\\{t - x : x \in X\\}\]is $H$-stable. Since the $H$-action respects multiplication in $L[t]$, it follows that the product of these linear polynomials is fixed by $H$:
\[f_X \in L[t]^H = L^H[t]\]and so $f _ X$ has coefficients in $L^H$.
(Alternatively, can consider that the coefficients are given by symmetric functions of the roots).
Alternative characterisations of being Galois
Suppose:
- $K/F$ is a finite extension
- $G = \text{Gal}(K/F)$
@State some equivalent conditions to the condition that $K/F$ is Galois.
The following are equivalent:
- $K/F$ is Galois.
- $ \vert G \vert = [K : F]$
- $F = K^G$
Suppose:
- $K/F$ is a Galois extension
- $G = \text{Gal}(K/F)$
- $ \vert G \vert = [K : F]$
@State a result about the relationship between $F$, $K$ and $G$.
@Prove that if:
- $K/F$ is a Galois extension
- $G = \text{Gal}(K/F)$
- $ \vert G \vert = [K : F]$
Then:
\[F = K^G\]
This is a consequence of three other results:
- $G = \text{Gal}(K/K^G)$
- $ \vert G \vert \le [K : K^G]$ (applying the upper bound on the size of Galois groups to $\text{Gal}(K/K^G)$)
- $[K : K^G] \le [K : F]$ by the tower law, since $K/K^G/F$.
Then:
\[|G| \le [K : K^G] \le [K : F] = |G|\]and so $[K : K^G] = [K : F]$ and hence $[K^G : F] = 1$, and so $K^G = F$.
Suppose:
- $K/F$ is a finite field extension
- $G = \text{Gal}(K/F)$
- $F = K^G$
@State a result about what you can then conclude about $K/F$.
$K/F$ is Galois.
@Prove that if:
- $K/F$ is a finite field extension
- $G = \text{Gal}(K/F)$
- $F = K^G$
Then:
- $K/F$ is Galois.
Let $\{z _ 1, \ldots, z _ n\}$ be an $F$-basis for $K$. Since $G$ is finite (by the result that says finite field extensions lead to finite Galois groups), it follows that the set
\[X := \bigcup^n_{i = 1} G\cdot z_i\]is finite as well as $G$-stable.
Then we can construct the polynomial $f _ X$ where
\[f_X := \prod_{y \in X} (t - y)\]which is a separable polynomial with coefficients in $K^G$ (this is nontrivial and comes from a previous result). Since $K^G = F$, it follows $f _ X \in F[t]$.
Since $f _ X$ splits completely over $K$ ($G \cdot z _ i \subseteq K$) and since $K$ is generated by the roots of $f _ X$ in $K$, it is the splitting field of $f _ X$ over $F$.
Abelian extensions
@Define what it means for a Galois extension $K/\mathbb Q$ to be abelian.
is an abelian group.
Useful identification with a subgroup of $S _ n$
@Prove that if:
- $f \in F[t]$ has $n$ distinct roots in a splitting field $K$
then:
- $G = \text{Gal}(K/F)$ is naturally isomorphic to a subgroup of $S _ n$
- Further, $f$ is irreducible then this subgroup is transitive
Naturally isomorphic to a subgroup of $S _ n$:
We show there is an injection $\rho : G \to S _ n$. Let $V(f)$ be the set of roots of $f$. Then the action of $G$ on $K$ restricts to an action on $V(f)$. Hence let
\[\rho : G \to \text{Sym}(V(f)) \cong S _ n\]This map is injective, since if $\rho(\sigma) = \text{id}$ for some $\rho \in G$, then $\sigma$ fixes $V(f)$ pointwise. But $V(f)$ generates $K$ as a field together with $F$, so $\sigma$ fixes all elements of $K$ and hence $\sigma = 1$. Therefore
\[G \cong \rho(G) \le S _ n\]If $f$ irreducible, then this subgroup is transitive:
If $f$ is irreducible, then $f = m _ {F, \alpha}$ where $\alpha \in V(f)$. Then applying the result
\[\varphi^\ast : F(\alpha) \to \tilde F(\tilde \alpha)\]If
- $\varphi : F \to \tilde F$ is an isomorphism between two fields
- $K / F$ and $\tilde F / \tilde K$ are finite extensions
- $\alpha \in K$, $\tilde \alpha \in \tilde K$
- $\varphi(m _ {F, \alpha})(\tilde \alpha) = 0$
Then there is a unique extension of $\varphi$ to
such that $\varphi^\ast (\alpha) = \tilde \alpha$.
where $\varphi$ is the identity and $\tilde \alpha$ is any other root. This gives at least one automorphism of $K$ that swaps $\alpha$ and $\tilde \alpha$, so $G$ is transitive.
Relationship between the Galois group of a field extension and the Galois groups of minimal polynomials of elements of that extension
@State two results concerning the minimal polynomial of any element of a Galois extension.
Suppose:
- $K/F$ is a Galois extension
- $\alpha \in K$
Then:
- $m _ {F, \alpha}$ is separable, and
- There is a surjective group homomorphism $\text{Gal}(K/F) \to \text{Gal} _ F(m _ {F, \alpha})$
(This result is useful mainly because it comes up in the proof that field extensions with solvable Galois groups are radical).
@Prove that if:
- $K/F$ is a Galois extension
- $\alpha \in K$
Then:
- $m _ {F, \alpha}$ is separable, and
- There is a surjective group homomorphism $\text{Gal}(K/F) \to \text{Gal} _ F(m _ {F, \alpha})$
(You may assume previous results).
- $m _ {F, \alpha}$ is irreducible over $F$ and has a zero in $K$ (namely $\alpha$)
- Since $K/F$ is Galois, it is in particular normal.
- Therefore $m _ {F, \alpha}$ splits completely in $K$, and so $K$ contains a splitting field of $m _ {F, \alpha}$, say $L$.
- By another result, $m _ {F, \alpha} = m _ {K^G, \alpha} = f _ {G \cdot \alpha} = \prod _ {\beta \in G\cdot\alpha}(t - \beta)$.
-
Since $f _ X$ is always separable, it follows $m _ {F, \alpha}$ is always separable.
- Therefore $L/F$ is Galois (it is the splitting field of some separable polynomial).
- $\text{Gal} _ F(m _ {F, \alpha}) = \text{Gal}(L/F)$ and so the restriction map $\text{Gal}(K/F) \to \text{Gal}(L/F)$ is a surjective group homomorphism.
Composite field extensions
Suppose:
- $K \supseteq L _ 1, L _ 2 \supseteq F$
- $L _ 1/F$ and $L _ 2/F$ are Galois extensions
- $L$ is the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $L _ 1$ and $L _ 2$ ($L = L _ 1 L _ 2$, their “compositum”)
@State a result about how the Galois groups of each of these extensions relate to one another.
- $L/F$ is also Galois
- There is an injective homomorphism $\phi : \text{Gal}(L/F) \to \text{Gal}(L _ 1/F) \times \text{Gal}(L _ 2 / F)$
- If $L _ 1 \cap L _ 2 = F$ (“linearly disjoint”), then this homomorphism is an isomorphism
@exam~
Suppose:
- $K \supseteq L _ 1, L _ 2 \supseteq F$
- $L _ 1/F$ and $L _ 2/F$ are Galois extensions
- $L$ is the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $L _ 1$ and $L _ 2$ ($L = L _ 1 L _ 2$, their “compositum”)
@Prove:
- $L/F$ is also Galois
- There is an injective homomorphism $\phi : \text{Gal}(L/F) \to \text{Gal}(L _ 1/F) \times \text{Gal}(L _ 2 / F)$
- If $L _ 1 \cap L _ 2 = F$ (“linearly disjoint”), then this homomorphism is an isomorphism
$L/F$ is Galois:
$L _ 1$ and $L _ 2$ are the splitting fields of separable polynomials $f _ 1, f _ 2 \in F[x]$. Then $F$ is the splitting field of $f _ 1 f _ 2$, which is also separable. Hence $L/F$ is also Galois.
There is an injective homomorphism $\phi : \text{Gal}(L/F) \to \text{Gal}(L _ 1/F) \times \text{Gal}(L _ 2 / F)$:
Let $G := \text{Gal}(L/F)$ and $H := \text{Gal}(L _ 1/F) \times \text{Gal}(L _ 2 / F)$. Let $\phi : G \to H$ be the map which sends $\sigma \to (\sigma \vert _ {L _ 1}, \sigma \vert _ {L _ 2})$. This map is well-defined as $L _ 1 / F$ and $L _ 2/F$ are both Galois extensions contained in $K$.
To see it is injective, suppose $\phi(\sigma) = (\text{id} _ {L _ 1}, \text{id} _ {L _ 2})$. Since $L$ is generated by the union of the generators for $L _ 1$ and $L _ 2$, it must also be the identity on $L$.
If $L _ 1 \cap L _ 2 = F$, then this homomorphism is an isomorphism:
It suffices to show that $ \vert G \vert = \vert H \vert $. Let $\iota$ be the restriction map
\[\iota : \text{Gal}(L / L_2) \to \text{Gal}(L_1 / F)\]which sends $\sigma$ to $\sigma \vert _ {L _ 1}$. Since $L _ 2$ contains $F$, the image of $\iota$ fixes $F$. Since $L _ 1$ is Galois, $\iota$ is well-defined and it is injective since any element of its kernel must be the identity on both $L _ 1$ and $L _ 2$.
To see $\iota$ is also surjective, we show that
\[[F : L_2] = |S| = |\text{Gal}(L_1 / K)| = [L_1 : K]\]as then the size of the domain and range are equal. Consider the subgroup $\iota(\text{Gal}(L/L _ 2))$. Then
\[[L_1 : L_1^\iota(\text{Gal}(L/L_2))] = |\text{Gal}(L/L_2)|\]as the action of $\iota(\text{Gal}(L/L _ 2))$ on $L _ 1$ is faithful. If we can show $L _ 1^{\iota(\text{Gal}(L/L _ 2))} = L _ 1 \cap L _ 2$, then we will be done as $L _ 1 \cap L _ 2 = F$.
Note
\[\\{x \in L : g(x) = x \text{ } \forall g \in \text{Gal}(L/L_2)\\} = L_2\]by the Galois correspondence on $L/F$. Therefore
\[L_1^{\iota(\text{Gal}(L/L_2))} = \\{x \in L_1 : g(x) = x \text{ } \forall g \in \text{Gal}(F/L_2)\\} = L_1 \cap L_2\]and hence
\[|H| = |\text{Gal}(L_1 / F)| \times |\text{Gal}(L_2 / F)| = [L_1 : F][L_2 : F] = [L : L_2][L_2 : F] = [L : F] = |G|\]as required.
@exam~
Examples and counterexamples
Give an @example of a field extension that is not Galois because of normality reasons.
Consider $\mathbb Q[\alpha] / \mathbb Q$ where $\alpha = \sqrt[3]{2}$. Then $m _ \mathbb Q(x) = x^3 - 2$, but $m(x)$ does not split completely, since it has two roots which are not in $\mathbb Q[\alpha]$.
Give an @example of a field extension that is not Galois because of separability reasons.
Consider $F := \mathbb F _ p(t)$ be the field of fractions over the finite field of size $p$, and let $K$ be a field extension of $F$ containing a root $\alpha$ of $f(x) := x^p - t$. But then $K / F$ is not Galois as it is not separable, since $m _ {F, \alpha}$ is not separable.
Give an @example to show that if you have the sequence of extensions $K ‘ / K / F$ where $K/F$ and $K’/K$ are both Galois, it doesn’t need to be the case that $K’ / F$ is Galois.
- Let $F = \mathbb Q$, $K = \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)$, $K’ = \mathbb Q(2^{1/4})$.
- Then:
- $K/F$ is Galois (it’s the splitting field of $x^2 - 2$)
- $K’/F$ is Galois (it’s the splitting field of $x^2 - \sqrt{2}$)
- $K’/F$ is not Galois, since $m _ {\mathbb Q, 2^{1/4} } = x^4 - 2$, which does not split over $K’ \subseteq \mathbb R$.
@exam~
Show that every degree 2 extension $L/K$ where $K$ is a field of odd characteristic is a Galois extension.
Pick any $\alpha \in L \setminus K$. Then $m _ {K, \alpha}(x) = x^2 + bx + c$ for some $b, c \in K$ and this polynomial is irreducible. Since $m _ {K, \alpha}’(x) = 2x + b$, it follows that $m _ {K, \alpha}$ is separable.
We aim to show that $L$ is a splitting field for $m _ {K, \alpha}$. By the quadratic formula,
\[\begin{aligned} m_{K, \alpha}(x) &= \left(x - \frac{-b +\sqrt{b^2 - 4c}}{2}\right) \left(x - \frac{-b - \sqrt{b^2 - 4c}}{2}\right) \\\\ &= (x - \alpha)(x - (\alpha - b)) \end{aligned}\]Since $\alpha, \alpha - b \in L$ and $L = F(\alpha)$, so $L$ is the splitting field.
@exam~ @example~