Linear Algebra II HT23, Determinants


Determinants

When building up determinants as a determinantal mapping $D: M _ n(\mathbb{R}) \to \mathbb{R}$, what are the three conditions a determinantal map must satsify?

  • Multilinear in the columns \(D[\ldots,\lambda \pmb{b} _ i + \mu\pmb{c} _ i, \ldots] = \lambda D[\ldots,\pmb{b} _ i,\ldots] + \mu D[\ldots,\pmb{a} _ i,\ldots]\)
  • Alternating \(D[\ldots,\pmb{a}\ _ i,\pmb{a}\ _ {i+1},\ldots] = 0 \text{ when } \pmb{a}\ _ i = \pmb{a}\ _ {i+1}\)
  • $D(I _ n) = 1$ for the $n \times n$ identity matrix

What’s the geometric interpretation behind a determinantal map being multilinear in the columns, i.e. $D[\ldots,\lambda \pmb{b} _ i + \mu\pmb{c} _ i, \ldots] = \lambda D[\ldots,\pmb{b} _ i,\ldots] + \mu D[\ldots,\pmb{a} _ i,\ldots]$?

It represents the fact that stretching a face with scale the area/volume accordingly.

What’s the geometric interpretation behind a determinantal map being alternating, i.e. $D[\ldots,\pmb{a} _ i,\pmb{a} _ {i+1},\ldots] = 0 \text{ when } \pmb{a} _ i = \pmb{a} _ {i+1}$ ?

A shape with thickness has no volume.

If $\lambda = \det [\ldots, \pmb{a}, \ldots, \pmb{b}, \ldots]$, then what is $\det [\ldots, \pmb{b},\ldots, \pmb{a}, \ldots]$?

\[-\lambda\]

What is $\det [\ldots,\pmb{a},\ldots,\pmb{a},\ldots]$?

\[0\]

When proving that there exists a map $D _ n$ that satisfies the properties of being a determinantal map on $n\times n$ matrices

Multilinear in the columns \(D[\ldots,\lambda \pmb{b} _ i + \mu\pmb{c} _ i, \ldots] = \lambda D[\ldots,\pmb{b} _ i,\ldots] + \mu D[\ldots,\pmb{a} _ i,\ldots]\) Alternating \(D[\ldots,\pmb{a}\ _ i,\pmb{a}\ _ {i+1},\ldots] = 0 \text{ when } \pmb{a}\ _ i = \pmb{a}\ _ {i+1}\) $D(I _ n) = 1$ for the $n \times n$ identity matrix

In the inductive step, what do you define $D _ n$ as, in terms of $D _ {n-1}$?

\[D _ n(A) = a _ {11}D _ {n-1}(A _ {11}) - a _ {12}D _ {n-2}(A _ {12}) + \ldots + (-1)^{n-1}a _ {1n}D _ {n-1}(A _ {1n})\]

Can you give the Laplace expansion formula for $\det A$ along row $i$?

\[\det A = \sum _ {j=1}^{n} a _ {ij} (-1)^{i+j} \det A _ {ij}\]

^laplace-expansion-row

Can you give the Laplace expansion formula for $\det A$ along column $j$?

\[\det A = \sum^n _ {i=1} a _ {ij}(-1)^{i+j} \det A _ {ij}\]

Can you give the permutation formula for $\det A$?

\[\det A = \sum _ {\sigma \text{ perm. of } \\{1,\ldots,n\\} \space} \text{sgn}(\sigma)a _ {\sigma(1)1}a _ {\sigma(2)2}\ldots a _ {\sigma(n)n}\]

What is $\det A^\intercal$?

\[\det A\]

What is $\det BA$?

\[\det A \det B\]

Why is $\det A$ multilinear in rows as well as columns, despite this not being in the definition?

Because $\det A = \det A^\intercal$.

Using the Rule of Sarrus (cool name) mneumonic, what is \(\left \vert \begin{matrix} a \& b \& c \\\\ d \& e \& f \\\\ g \& h \& i \end{matrix}\right \vert\)?

\[\begin{aligned} &aei + dhc + gbf\\\\ -&ceg-fha-ibd \end{aligned}\]

If $A$ is a upper or lower triangular matrix, what is the determinant?

\[\prod^n _ {i=1} a _ {ii}\]

To prove the more general $\det AB = \det A \det B$, what do you show first?

\(\det EA = \det E\det A\) where $E$ is an elementary matrix.

How does the determinant change when you swap two rows of a matrix?

It switches sign.

How does the determinant change when you add a scalar multiple of one row to another in a matrix?

It does not change.

How does the determinant change when you multiply one row of a matrix by a non-zero scalar $\lambda$?

The determinant is multiplied by $\lambda$.

Proofs

Important ones

Prove that there exists a map $D _ n$ that satisfies the properties of being a determinantal map on $n\times n$ matrices.

Multilinear in the columns \(D[\ldots,\lambda \pmb{b} _ i + \mu\pmb{c} _ i, \ldots] = \lambda D[\ldots,\pmb{b} _ i,\ldots] + \mu D[\ldots,\pmb{a} _ i,\ldots]\) Alternating \(D[\ldots,\pmb{a} _ i,\pmb{a} _ {i+1},\ldots] = 0 \text{ when } \pmb{a} _ i = \pmb{a} _ {i+1}\) $D(I _ n) = 1$ for the $n \times n$ identity matrix

Todo?

Prove if there exists a unique map $D _ n$ that satisfies the properties of being a determinantal map on $n\times n$ matrices:

Multilinear in the columns \(D[\ldots,\lambda \pmb{b} _ i + \mu\pmb{c} _ i, \ldots] = \lambda D[\ldots,\pmb{b} _ i,\ldots] + \mu D[\ldots,\pmb{a} _ i,\ldots]\) Alternating \(D[\ldots,\pmb{a} _ i,\pmb{a} _ {i+1},\ldots] = 0 \text{ when } \pmb{a} _ i = \pmb{a} _ {i+1}\) $D(I _ n) = 1$ for the $n \times n$ identity matrix

Hint: This involves showing the following formula is true for the determinant:

\[\det A = \sum _ {\sigma \text{ perm. of } \\{1,\ldots,n\\} \space} \text{sgn}(\sigma)a _ {\sigma(1)1}a _ {\sigma(2)2}\ldots a _ {\sigma(n)n}\]

Todo?

Not-so-important ones

Prove that if a map $D _ n$ satisfies the properties of being a determinantal map on $n \times n$ matrices

Multilinear in the columns \(D[\ldots,\lambda \pmb{b} _ i + \mu\pmb{c} _ i, \ldots] = \lambda D[\ldots,\pmb{b} _ i,\ldots] + \mu D[\ldots,\pmb{a} _ i,\ldots]\) Alternating \(D[\ldots,\pmb{a} _ i,\pmb{a} _ {i+1},\ldots] = 0 \text{ when } \pmb{a} _ i = \pmb{a} _ {i+1}\) $D(I _ n) = 1$ for the $n \times n$ identity matrix

Then the alternating condition can be strengthened to

\[\det [\ldots,\pmb{a},\ldots,\pmb{a},\ldots] = 0\]

Todo?

Prove that if a map $D _ n$ satisfies the properties of being a determinantal map on $n \times n$ matrices

Multilinear in the columns \(D[\ldots,\lambda \pmb{b} _ i + \mu\pmb{c} _ i, \ldots] = \lambda D[\ldots,\pmb{b} _ i,\ldots] + \mu D[\ldots,\pmb{a} _ i,\ldots]\) Alternating \(D[\ldots,\pmb{a} _ i,\pmb{a} _ {i+1},\ldots] = 0 \text{ when } \pmb{a} _ i = \pmb{a} _ {i+1}\) $D(I _ n) = 1$ for the $n \times n$ identity matrix

Then it is also true that

\[\det [\ldots,\pmb{a},\ldots,\pmb{b},\ldots] = -\det [\ldots,\pmb{b},\ldots,\pmb{a},\ldots]\]

Todo?

Prove that $\det A = \det A^\intercal$.

Todo.

Prove

\[\det A = 0 \iff A \text{ singular}\]

Todo.

Prove \(\det E A = \det E \det A\) where $E$ is an elementary matrix.

Todo

Prove \(\det A B = \det A \det B\) by appealing to a lemma.

Todo.

Prove that if $V$ is a vector space and $T : V \to V$ is linear then $\det T$ defined by $\det T = \det M^\mathcal{B}$ where $M^\mathcal{B}$ is the transformation matrix of $T$ with respect to a basis $\mathcal{B}$ does not depend on the choice of basis.

Todo.




Related posts